http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joMysMDHdb4
A very interesting video on Detroit with the one and only Johnny Knoxville. Its actually a 3 part clip, and part 2 and 3 are on the thumbnails to the right on the video's page. It takes a very interesting look and perspective of Detroit from the art and music scene. To them, Detroit is a city full of hope and opportunity, and they focus much less on the negative aspects. Now of course they offer a very limited view of the residents, and dont show children or families or the ones who live in complete poverty. But it does offer a very interesting inside look into a bustling population that is attempting to eradicate the negative views of the city.
Daniel Hewes- Detroit
Urbanized--Sam Levy
This is the trailer for a film called Urbanized by Gary Hustwit, and is the third installment in his design trilogy. Urbanized deals with the issue of city design--"Who is allowed to shape our cities, and how do they do it?" I don't know much about this project personally(an architecture major friend of mine shared this with me), but I thought it looked extremely interesting and wanted to share it with the class. The website, http://urbanizedfilm.com/, contains more information about Urbanized and Hustwit's previous two films.
Interesting TED Talk on the Construction of the City
As someone who watches a lot of TED talks, I found this one to be particularly pertinent to our recent class discussions. We have just finished our papers about the construction of the city, but we more or less addressed it through individual perceptions. Jaime Lerner, in his lecture, talks about the construction of a city with the environment in mind. I thought that it was most interesting that he focused so heavily on transportation infrastructure within the city, such as the construction of new metros and bus lines. We spoke to the nature of walking as a means of constructing the city, but in what ways does public transportation play a dis/similar role? I invite you to take a listen to the talk and ponder this question. Plus, it is always fun when a presenter can get the TED audience to break into song.
Jaime Lerner sings of the city | Video on TED.com
- Erin
Place and Space in Detroit
I found this video on a friend's blog, and while I guess the birth of techno hasn't been one of the themes we've pursued in class, the presentation of the video made me think about the nature of place and space in a city that is considered by some to be "a dead city." How do we perceive these concepts in a place that apparently lacks some of the aspects that we usually use to define a city?
A good, thought-provoking example of this is when they talk about "warehouse parties" (around 8 minutes in). Warehouse parties consist of "500 to 1,000 people" filling up a large abandoned building for a music show (in this case, electronic music). What I find interesting about this is that it takes a place--a derelict building, considered by most to have little to no value in and of its own--and turns it into a space, filled with meaning, relationships, and shared experiences.
In a place of which the only representation we are given by the media is that of abandoned, falling down buildings, high homelessness, and unemployment rates, it is interesting to see another perspective on finding meaning in the city.
Rebecca Willett
What Creates a City?
I did some wondering over the weekend and started thinking about how cities are created, replicated, and recognized. Is there a certain set of objects a place must contain in order to classify as a city? Can these images be taken out of city and still maintain their integrity or identity as "city items"? Development of a city is a funny thing. It has to happen for a city to exist (surely objects did not amass overnight to create such a body) but rarely have we been priviledged to a specific image oriented documentation of such growth.
This is in no way a photographic display meant to showcase ability or skill. (They were taken on my cell phone in the heat of a brain storm.) So, while the quality may be sub-par I hope you'll see the underlying premise anyway.
I have selected a few photos taken on a journey and wish to know if these representative of a city, a suburb, or a rural town. You can analyze them piecewise or in totality. My main objective was to inquire whether scenes/images/objects could contain the identity of the city on their own through recognition or if inhabiting a city is the only means of acquiring such an identity. If I were to say where these were taken it would spoil the experiment but if you have any questions please feel free to approach me in class.
Alexis Brinkman
New Yorker Cover-Hana Nobel
Daniel Hewes- Crazy Italian Intersection
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bc7_1314431562
A short clip of an intersection in Italy. Faster, and more dangerous than the one we watched in class. A lot of close calls, but everyone seems to be used to it, and no accidents. Fiats seem to be the car of choice in these crowded, fast moving cities in Europe. Apologies for the ads on the sides of the clip, as some might be slightly inappropriate.
Daniel Hewes
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-676352?hpt=hp_bn2
Some pretty neat pictures of signs that went up in NYC that address urban etiquette
DL - The Cats of Mirikitani
The Boston Film Festival
Julie Giles
"Say Something NIce"- Improv Everywhere
DL - A street scene in Naples
DL - Grand Central Flash Mob
Sam Freedman, In Defense of Story
Hi folks! As an anthropology student, I've been exposed to many anthropological texts, treatises, essays, and dissertations, most of which resemble that of Neil Leach's The Hieroglyphics of Space... ; these passages are filled with thick, dense methodological frameworks and pedantic rhetoric that use a lot of terms like 'spatial images', 'semiological discourse', and 'cognitive mapping'. The phrases 'multiplicity', 'untheorized', 're-presentation', 'cultural production' and 'epistemological method' are also very popular. This "anthropological voice" seems to be very fashionable in the modern era; perhaps it represents an effort to solidify Anthropology's place among (what some claim to be) the "reputable" areas of study- namely the hard sciences- in the artificial hierarchy of academia. Perhaps the over-saturation of theoretical arguments, conjectures, and postulates is meant to reconcile the age-old dilemma of maintaining objectivity while studying the "other".
In any event, there seem to be- in my mind- two distinct models of producing anthropological text. The first is represented by Leach's introduction, the second by Benjamin's Hashish in Marseilles. The former is an analytical, method-based approach that describes theories and lenses through which to understand certain phenomena. The latter takes on the form of a story, a flowing narrative that neglects to explicitly articulate the structural lens- the perceiving lens is rather implied through the raconteur's account, leaving the reader to analyze, compare, and dissect (if she so chooses). The 'story' is a lively, vivid account that evokes the reader's senses/emotions, enabling her to truly be there, while, the analytical method is mostly detached and disconnected from the actual physical/psychological essence of place, serving instead as a diagnostic instrument for interpretation. Some argue that without theory, without 'epistemological framework', anthropology would just be fiction, not worthy of genuine, verifiable academic merit. It's an effort to transform story into science. It's an effort to catalog and compartmentalize the richness of the felt experience, thereby reducing it to something finite, something controllable and thus subject to 'understanding'. The objectification of the world is a dehumanizing impossibility, and it assumes that there even exists a reality independent of that which is 'observing'. More likely is the conclusion that there is no such thing as observation, but only the subjective perceptions of various participating entities, both of which are co-creating respective realities. Fiction is all there really is, anyway.
to be continued...
Samantha Levy
One of the clearest memories from my childhood is driving to the museum of science and industry with my dad on a saturday afternoon. The museum is located on the south side of Chicago, and in order to get there we would take Lake Shore Drive. About 500 feet before the entrance to the museum, there was a bump in the road, one that caused my stomach to turn every time we went over it. This stomach-flopping was my way of knowing we were almost there, that our time on Lake Shore Drive was coming to an end. I cannot think about Chicago without thinking about Lake Shore Drive. It snakes along between the city and Lake Michigan, following the twists and turns of the shoreline. What most people don’t realize about Lake Michigan is that you can’t see to the other side, so when you’re driving along Lake Shore Drive, you have sprawling city on one side, endless blue on the other. If you access Lake Shore Drive from its northern-most point like I did growing up just outside of the city, you have the extra advantage of watching the skyline materialize before your eyes. As you drive south you pass Michigan Avenue, then turn a corner and cross the Chicago River. Look to the right and you’re in a skyscraper jungle, Trump Tower shines further on down the river, the Sears Tower peeks out between two buildings. To the left is Navy Pier, whose huge ferris wheel towers over the throngs of visitors. Keep going south and you pass Millennium Park, home of the “Bean” and a spectacular amphitheater designed by Frank Gehry. As you continue to wind your way through the city you can’t help but be struck by its beauty. Chicago is unassuming and modest, much like its inhabitants, and this is one of its best kept secrets. You may have to work a little harder for it, but Chicago has so much more to offer than meets the surface. All you have to do is get there.
Rebecca Willett - Not So Alone in Managua
Inner City, Inner Self: A Memoir (Alexis Brinkman)
Katie Gosselin
Katrina Razon's City Memoir: Manila, Philippines
Naomi Litman-Zelle
Jillian Chaffee
Daniel Hewes
James Tanch
Upon landing in Costa Rica there is a forty-five minute ride to get to the capital of San Jose from Alajuela, the country's second largest city. The whirring highway is packed full of compact cars from the '80s and '90s and it's easy to tell where the deadly highway got its deadly reputation from. During that ride, you forget about the beaches and canopies you see in the ecotourism advertisements and are instantly reminded that you are at the seat of a developing nation. The seemingly half-constructed homes stick out at you against the towering mountainous backdrop yet the whole scene blends together so well. Face glued to the window, I couldn't stop thinking about how I would be spending the next six months there. Even over a year since returning, I still struggle to find the words to do justice to that feeling of seeing something so different than what I had ever seen before.
As you near the city center, the air thickens and the potholes get bigger and bigger. The construction of the buildings doesn't change dramatically but the density of them does. They seemed to be stacked on one another but there isn't really a skyscraper in sight. Inside the city the population is buzzing and there are people everywhere. The heat is intense. As soon as you step foot into downtown, people are trying to sell you anything from bootleg DVDs to bizarre fruit I had never seen before. It's impossible to walk downtown without being harassed by the "illegal" street vendors—they get more aggressive the closer you get to the mercado central. Everything was so dizzying and exciting at the same time; all I could do was wander my first day soaking up as much of it as possible.
Helen Ramsay
Pia Tempestini
Allison McCurdy
Bill Shaner
Julie Giles
Ryan O'Connor
Preston Beyer
Jessica Nicolosi City Memory
Hannah Andrew